<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Elects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/</link>
	<description>a blog of Andy Moore</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>On my way back something caught my eye in the londonpaper, its a site which is offering the people a chance to run for mayor. Seems pretty interesting!
http://www.londonelectsyou.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my way back something caught my eye in the londonpaper, its a site which is offering the people a chance to run for mayor. Seems pretty interesting!<br />
<a href="http://www.londonelectsyou.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.londonelectsyou.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilcock</title>
		<link>http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Not a bad summing-up of the three; I suspect a lot of Londoners agree with you on Brian (best for the job) and Ken (dodgy egomaniac, but at least he makes the buses run a bit better), and I’m one of them. I admit I might be even harsher to Boris than you are.

But hang on… What’s all this “it is Brian Paddick who I think would do the best job, but a vote for him makes a win by the imbecilic Boris more likely”? It wouldn’t, you know. 

I think you’ve missed two things. First, as you say, “we still have 98 days to go” – and, as far as elections go, that’s an awfully long time for opinion to change. Don’t give up so soon! The main thing, though, is the voting system for the Major. In London (unlike for your MP), you get to make two choices. When the vote’s counted, if your top choice isn’t in the top two, they look at your second choice. If *that* one’s in the top two, your vote just gets added to their stack. So there’s no reason to hold your nose and vote for Ken; you can vote on hope first, and let your back-up vote be about fear.

So can I suggest that – on the unlikely notion that absolutely nothing changes in the next 98 days of campaigning – what you’ve written above could be best put into effect by you voting:
1 – Paddick (because he’s the one you think would be best at it)
2 – Livingstone (because if your top choice doesn’t make it, he’s left as the ‘not Boris’ candidate)

Nice Blog title, btw. Alliteration goes a long way ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad summing-up of the three; I suspect a lot of Londoners agree with you on Brian (best for the job) and Ken (dodgy egomaniac, but at least he makes the buses run a bit better), and I’m one of them. I admit I might be even harsher to Boris than you are.</p>
<p>But hang on… What’s all this “it is Brian Paddick who I think would do the best job, but a vote for him makes a win by the imbecilic Boris more likely”? It wouldn’t, you know. </p>
<p>I think you’ve missed two things. First, as you say, “we still have 98 days to go” – and, as far as elections go, that’s an awfully long time for opinion to change. Don’t give up so soon! The main thing, though, is the voting system for the Major. In London (unlike for your MP), you get to make two choices. When the vote’s counted, if your top choice isn’t in the top two, they look at your second choice. If *that* one’s in the top two, your vote just gets added to their stack. So there’s no reason to hold your nose and vote for Ken; you can vote on hope first, and let your back-up vote be about fear.</p>
<p>So can I suggest that – on the unlikely notion that absolutely nothing changes in the next 98 days of campaigning – what you’ve written above could be best put into effect by you voting:<br />
1 – Paddick (because he’s the one you think would be best at it)<br />
2 – Livingstone (because if your top choice doesn’t make it, he’s left as the ‘not Boris’ candidate)</p>
<p>Nice Blog title, btw. Alliteration goes a long way <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hill</title>
		<link>http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Ooops, messed up the link to my London site above!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, messed up the link to my London site above!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hill</title>
		<link>http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymoore.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/london-elects/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I think you probably speak for a lot of Londoners, Andy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you probably speak for a lot of Londoners, Andy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
